[PATCH v5 09/12] arm64: mm: replace TIF_LAZY_MMU with in_lazy_mmu_mode()

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 24/11/25 6:52 PM, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> The generic lazy_mmu layer now tracks whether a task is in lazy MMU
> mode. As a result we no longer need a TIF flag for that purpose -
> let's use the new in_lazy_mmu_mode() helper instead.
> 
> The explicit check for in_interrupt() is no longer necessary either
> as in_lazy_mmu_mode() always returns false in interrupt context.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky at arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h     | 19 +++----------------
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h |  3 +--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index a7d99dee3dc4..dd7ed653a20d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -62,28 +62,16 @@ static inline void emit_pte_barriers(void)
>  
>  static inline void queue_pte_barriers(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	if (in_interrupt()) {
> -		emit_pte_barriers();
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	flags = read_thread_flags();
> -
> -	if (flags & BIT(TIF_LAZY_MMU)) {
> +	if (in_lazy_mmu_mode()) {
>  		/* Avoid the atomic op if already set. */
> -		if (!(flags & BIT(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING)))
> +		if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING))

A small nit - will it be better not to use test_thread_flag() here and just
keep checking flags like earlier to avoid non-related changes. Although not
a problem TBH.

>  			set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING);
>  	} else {
>  		emit_pte_barriers();
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static inline void arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> -{
> -	set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
> -}
> +static inline void arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(void) {}
>  
>  static inline void arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
>  {
> @@ -94,7 +82,6 @@ static inline void arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
>  static inline void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
>  {
>  	arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
> -	clear_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index f241b8601ebd..4ff8da0767d9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -84,8 +84,7 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
>  #define TIF_SME_VL_INHERIT	28	/* Inherit SME vl_onexec across exec */
>  #define TIF_KERNEL_FPSTATE	29	/* Task is in a kernel mode FPSIMD section */
>  #define TIF_TSC_SIGSEGV		30	/* SIGSEGV on counter-timer access */
> -#define TIF_LAZY_MMU		31	/* Task in lazy mmu mode */
> -#define TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING	32	/* Ops pending for lazy mmu mode exit */
> +#define TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING	31	/* Ops pending for lazy mmu mode exit */
>  
>  #define _TIF_SIGPENDING		(1 << TIF_SIGPENDING)
>  #define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED	(1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED)

LGTM.

Hence with or without the 'flags' changes in queue_pte_barriers() above.

Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual at arm.com>