[PATCH RFC net-next 00/15] net: stmmac: rk: cleanups galore

[Jacob Keller]

On 12/1/2025 8:38 AM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> So, in future, I'm going to take the attitude that I will NAK
> contributions if I think there's a side issue that the contributor
> should also be addressing until that side issue is addressed.
> 
> This shouldn't be necessary, I wish this weren't necessary, and I wish
> people could be relied upon to do the right thing, but apparently it is
> going to take a stick (not merging their patches) to get them to co-
> operate. More fool me for trusting someone to do something.
> 

Yep this is unfortunately a reality of dealing with many contributors.
While its frustrating to require this.. If you don't, and end up never
getting things fixed the end result is worse.

As a maintainer, sometimes the only leverage you have is when someone
wants a contribution to merge. Balancing so that relevant improvements
and work get done while not being so harsh that contributors stop
returning is a difficult problem.

> I now have a couple of extra patches addressing my point raised in
> that email... which I myself shouldn't have had to write.
> 

:(
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20251203/b6becdae/attachment.sig>