[PATCH v5 06/12] mm: introduce generic lazy_mmu helpers

[Kevin Brodsky]

On 28/11/2025 14:50, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Would it make sense to explicitly describe the policy wrt sleeping while
> in lazy MMU mode? If I understand the conclusion of conversation right:
>
> * An arch implementation may disable preemption, but then it is arch
>   responsibility not to call any arch-specific code that might sleep;
> * As result, while in lazy MMU mode the generic code should never
>   call a code that might sleep;

I think that's a good summary, and I agree that the second point is not
obvious from the comment in <linux/pgtable.h>. This series it not making
any change in that respect, but I'll add a clarification in this patch
(or a separate patch).

- Kevin