[PATCH V2 3/3] arm64: dts: nvidia: Add nodes for CMDQV

[Robin Murphy]

On 2025-12-01 9:36 am, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> 
> On 11/25/2025 3:52 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 25/11/2025 07:16, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
>>> The Command Queue Virtualization (CMDQV) hardware is part of the
>>> SMMUv3 implementation on NVIDIA Tegra SoCs. It assists in
>>> virtualizing the command queue for the SMMU.
>>>
>>> Update SMMU compatible strings to use nvidia,tegra264-smmu to enable
>>> CMDQV support. Add device tree nodes for the CMDQV hardware and enable
>>> them on the tegra264-p3834 platform where SMMUs are enabled. Each SMMU
>>> instance is paired with its corresponding CMDQV instance via the
>>> nvidia,cmdqv property.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre at nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264-p3834.dtsi |  8 +++
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi      | 55 +++++++++++++++++--
>>>   2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264-p3834.dtsi b/arch/ 
>>> arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264-p3834.dtsi
>>> index 06795c82427a..375d122b92fa 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264-p3834.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264-p3834.dtsi
>>> @@ -26,5 +26,13 @@ iommu at 5000000 {
>>>           iommu at 6000000 {
>>>               status = "okay";
>>>           };
>>> +
>>> +        cmdqv at 5200000 {
>>> +            status = "okay";
>>> +        };
>>
>> This needs to be ordered in the file according to its address.
> 
> Hi Jon, Thanks for the review.
> cmdqv nodes follow same ordering as its corresponding iommu nodes.
> I have added them immediately after corresponding iommu nodes.
> Can you please check and see if it's fine? Same applies to your
> similar comments below as well.

It's fairly standard practice to order DT nodes by unit address where 
applicable (and alphabetically by node name otherwise). The platform 
maintainers aren't necessarily familiar with the intended usage of every 
individual node when they have to resolve merge conflicts etc., so 
maintaining a straightforward consistent pattern is generally easier for 
everyone.

Thanks,
Robin.