[PATCH] drivers: perf: use us_to_ktime() where appropriate

[Mark Rutland]

[adding Robin and LAKML]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 04:32:57PM +0800, Xichao Zhao wrote:
> The arm_ccn_pmu_poll_period_us are more suitable for using
> the us_to_ktime(). This can make the code more concise and
> enhance readability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xichao Zhao <zhao.xichao at vivo.com>

Superficially this looks fine to me, so:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>

Will, I assume that (if no-one complains) you'll pick this up when
queueing PMU patches.

Mark.

> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c
> index 1a0d0e1a2263..8af3563fdf60 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c
> @@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ module_param_named(pmu_poll_period_us, arm_ccn_pmu_poll_period_us, uint,
>  
>  static ktime_t arm_ccn_pmu_timer_period(void)
>  {
> -	return ns_to_ktime((u64)arm_ccn_pmu_poll_period_us * 1000);
> +	return us_to_ktime((u64)arm_ccn_pmu_poll_period_us);
>  }
>  
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>