[PATCH v6] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: allow multiple instances

[Deepti Jaggi]

On 7/30/25 14:30, Deepti Jaggi wrote:
> From: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela at quicinc.com>
>
> Allow multiple SCMI instances by extending the scmi node name to include
> an instance number suffix.
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela at quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepti Jaggi <quic_djaggi at quicinc.com>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
>          - Dropped 'this change' from description
> 	- Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250423005824.3993256-1-quic_djaggi@quicinc.com
>
> Changes in v5:
>          - Added Reviewed-by tag
> 	- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240910163456.2383372-1-quic_nkela@quicinc.com
>
> Changes in v4:
>          - Dropped 'virtual' from subject and description
> 	- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240905201217.3815113-1-quic_nkela@quicinc.com
>
> Changes in v3:
>          - Added Reviewed-by tag
>          - Removed the patch from original series[1]
>
> Changes in v2:
>          - Fixed scmi nodename pattern
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240903220240.2594102-1-quic_nkela@quicinc.com/
> ---
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> index abbd62f1fed0993ab98fa44bdb9a0575f8e1c78e..be817fd9cc34b14009a3b1d69e78b802215571b6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ anyOf:
>   
>   properties:
>     $nodename:
> -    const: scmi
> +    pattern: '^scmi(-[0-9]+)?$'
>   
>     compatible:
>       oneOf:
>
> ---
> base-commit: 0b90c3b6d76ea512dc3dac8fb30215e175b0019a
> change-id: 20250728-8255-scmi-ed963ef8f155

Gentle ping!!
Could you please review the patch?

> Best regards,