[PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: update pinctrl names for Radxa E52C

FUKAUMI Naoki naoki at radxa.com
Tue Aug 19 19:16:50 PDT 2025


Hi Chukun,

On 8/20/25 00:00, Chukun Pan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> "The name of a node should be somewhat generic".
>>
>>    https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/v0.4/source/chapter2-devicetree-basics.rst?plain=1#L193
> 
> Usually we use the name on the schematic. For example, the patch for e24c:

I don't mind using names that match the schematic, as long as the device 
tree maintainer doesn't object.

Best regards,

--
FUKAUMI Naoki
Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250727144409.327740-4-jonas@kwiboo.se/
> 
> ```
> +	gpio-keys {
> +		compatible = "gpio-keys";
> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> +		pinctrl-0 = <&gpio0_a0_user>;
> ```
> 
> If this is incorrect, I will abandon the pinctrl changes for
> the user key and power LED.
> 
>>> -		vcc_5v0_pwren_h: regulator-5v0-1 {
>>> -		usb_otg_pwren_h: regulator-5v0-0 {
> 
> But I don't think the above is correct.
> 
>>    https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241216113052.15696-1-naoki@radxa.com/T/#u
>>
>> (I don't understand why this only applies to me...)
> 
> I don't know this. I thought the nodenames of pinctrl and regulator
> were a bit weird, so I changed the pinctrl's.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chukun
> 
> --
> 2.25.1
> 
> 
> 




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list