[PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftest: Don't try to disable AArch64 support

[Marc Zyngier]

Trying to cut the branch you are sat on is pretty dumb. And so is
trying to disable the instruction set you are executing on.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c
index 322b9d3b01255..57708de2075df 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c
@@ -129,10 +129,10 @@ static const struct reg_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64pfr0_el1[] = {
 	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, DIT, 0),
 	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, SEL2, 0),
 	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, GIC, 0),
-	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, 0),
-	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL2, 0),
-	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL1, 0),
-	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL0, 0),
+	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL3, 1),
+	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL2, 1),
+	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL1, 1),
+	REG_FTR_BITS(FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, EL0, 1),
 	REG_FTR_END,
 };
 
-- 
2.39.2