[PATCH v4 7/7] mm/mm_init: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in init_unavailable_range()
Lorenzo Stoakes
lorenzo.stoakes at oracle.com
Mon Apr 28 01:25:36 PDT 2025
This fixes the issues for me thanks David + thanks Andrew for taking so
quick! :)
I know you're probably rebasing this Andrew so maybe not so useful, but
fwiw wrt the reported issue:
Tested-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes at oracle.com>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 04:07:46PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 09:30:50 +0100 David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2025-04-25 at 16:38 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:11:10 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes at oracle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Andrew - can we drop this from mm-new? It's breaking it.
> > >
> > > I almost did, but David seems to have a fix.
> > >
> > > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h~mm-mm_init-use-for_each_valid_pfn-in-init_unavailable_range-fix
> >
> > The symptoms only manifested when it got used in
> > init_unavailable_range() but that's actually a fix for the sparsemem
> > implementation of for_each_valid_pfn(), as David H surmised.
> >
> > Please could the fix be folded into
> > mm-implement-for_each_valid_pfn-for-config_sparsemem.patch ?
>
> yep, that's why I named the patch file
> "mm-mm_init-use-for_each_valid_pfn-in-init_unavailable_range-fix.patch".
> To tell myself to fold it into
> mm-mm_init-use-for_each_valid_pfn-in-init_unavailable_range.patch.
>
> > This is what it should look like with the fix:
> > https://git.infradead.org/?p=users/dwmw2/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=55bebbb093
>
> We're good.
>
> > If you want to keep the fix separate, then that's the patch that it
> > fixes. Do you want a commit message? I'll certainly give you a proper
> > SoB:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw at amazon.co.uk>
>
> I already unauthorisedly added that so I don't get grumpygrams from
> Stephen ;)
>
> > Happy to resend the fixed series if it helps; it looks like you've
> > already basically sorted it though?
>
> THanks, it doesn't appear necessary at this time.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list