[PATCH v2 01/22] iommufd/viommu: Add driver-allocated vDEVICE support
Baolu Lu
baolu.lu at linux.intel.com
Sat Apr 26 23:23:54 PDT 2025
On 4/26/25 13:57, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> @@ -120,6 +128,13 @@ struct iommufd_viommu {
> * array->entry_num to report the number of handled requests.
> * The data structure of the array entry must be defined in
> * include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
> + * @vdevice_alloc: Allocate a vDEVICE object and init its driver-level structure
> + * or HW procedure. Note that the core-level structure is filled
> + * by the iommufd core after calling this op. @virt_id carries a
> + * per-vIOMMU virtual ID for the driver to initialize its HW.
I'm wondering whether the 'per-vIOMMU virtual ID' is intended to be
generic for other features that might require a vdevice. I'm also not
sure where this virtual ID originates when I read it here. Could it
potentially come from the KVM instance? If so, how about retrieving it
directly from a struct kvm pointer? My understanding is that vIOMMU in
IOMMUFD acts as a handle to KVM, so perhaps we should maintain a
reference to the kvm pointer within the iommufd_viommu structure?
> + * @vdevice_destroy: Clean up all driver-specific parts of an iommufd_vdevice.
> + * The memory of the vDEVICE will be free-ed by iommufd core
> + * after calling this op
> */
> struct iommufd_viommu_ops {
> void (*destroy)(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu);
> @@ -128,6 +143,10 @@ struct iommufd_viommu_ops {
> const struct iommu_user_data *user_data);
> int (*cache_invalidate)(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
> struct iommu_user_data_array *array);
> + struct iommufd_vdevice *(*vdevice_alloc)(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
> + struct device *dev,
> + u64 virt_id);
> + void (*vdevice_destroy)(struct iommufd_vdevice *vdev);
> };
Thanks,
baolu
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list