[PATCH] drivers: soc: sunxi: Fix possible null pointer dereference
Andre Przywara
andre.przywara at arm.com
Thu Apr 24 16:38:36 PDT 2025
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 11:57:00 -0500
Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y at gmail.com> wrote:
> of_get_address() may return NULL which is later dereferenced.
> Fix this bug by adding NULL check
>
> This is similar to the commit c534b63bede6
> ("drm: vc4: Fix possible null pointer dereference").
>
> Signed-off-by: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y at gmail.com>
> Fixes: 4af34b572a85 ("drivers: soc: sunxi: Introduce SoC driver to map SRAMs")
That fix looks alright, indeed of_get_address() returns NULL if the
slightest bit in the property is not as expected, and we should check
for that.
I am just wondering if we should issue a firmware warning in this case,
instead of just silently skipping an entry.
Cheers,
Andre
> ---
> drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c b/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c
> index 2781a091a6a6..1853dcc806ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ static int sunxi_sram_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
> continue;
>
> sram_addr_p = of_get_address(sram_node, 0, NULL, NULL);
> + if (!sram_addr_p)
> + continue;
>
> seq_printf(s, "sram@%08x\n",
> be32_to_cpu(*sram_addr_p));
> @@ -134,6 +136,8 @@ static int sunxi_sram_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
>
> section_addr_p = of_get_address(section_node, 0,
> NULL, NULL);
> + if (!section_addr_p)
> + continue;
>
> seq_printf(s, "\tsection@%04x\t(%s)\n",
> be32_to_cpu(*section_addr_p),
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list