[PATCH v4 6/7] mm: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in memory_hotplug
David Hildenbrand
david at redhat.com
Thu Apr 24 14:15:07 PDT 2025
On 23.04.25 15:33, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw at amazon.co.uk>
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw at amazon.co.uk>
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt at kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 8305483de38b..8f74c55137bf 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1756,12 +1756,10 @@ static int scan_movable_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> {
> unsigned long pfn;
>
> - for (pfn = start; pfn < end; pfn++) {
> + for_each_valid_pfn (pfn, start, end) {
^
> struct page *page;
> struct folio *folio;
>
> - if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> - continue;
> page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> if (PageLRU(page))
> goto found;
> @@ -1805,11 +1803,9 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(migrate_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
> DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
>
> - for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
> + for_each_valid_pfn (pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn) {
^
Is there a reason for this space that I am unaware of? :)
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list