[PATCH 2/3] clk: samsung: exynosautov920: add cpucl0 clock support
손신
shin.son at samsung.com
Tue Apr 22 17:59:23 PDT 2025
Hello Krzysztof Kozlowski,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzk at kernel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 4:59 PM
> To: Shin Son <shin.son at samsung.com>; Sylwester Nawrocki
> <s.nawrocki at samsung.com>; Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi at samsung.com>; Alim
> Akhtar <alim.akhtar at samsung.com>; Michael Turquette
> <mturquette at baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>; Rob Herring
> <robh at kernel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt at kernel.org>; Sunyeal Hong
> <sunyeal.hong at samsung.com>
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: samsung: exynosautov920: add cpucl0 clock
> support
>
> On 18/04/2025 08:14, Shin Son wrote:
> > Register compatible and cmu_info data to support clock CMU_CPUCL0,
> > this provides clock for CPUCL0_SWTICH/DBG/CLUSTER.
> >
>
> Explain why this is needed as clk of declare, instead of platform driver.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
CPUCL0 refers CPU Cluster 0.
Since the CPU clocks need to be available as early as possible, I used CLK_OF_DECLARE instead of a platform driver.
I'll update the commit message and add a comment in the code to clarify this.
Best regards,
Shin Son
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list