[EXT] [PATCH] [v2] mmc: esdhc-imx: convert to modern PM_OPS
Luke Wang
ziniu.wang_1 at nxp.com
Sun Apr 13 23:49:01 PDT 2025
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter at intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2025 7:47 PM
> To: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1 at nxp.com>; Arnd Bergmann
> <arnd at kernel.org>; Bough Chen <haibo.chen at nxp.com>; Ulf Hansson
> <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>; Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>; Sascha
> Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>; Pengutronix Kernel Team
> <kernel at pengutronix.de>; Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com>; Josua
> Mayer <josua at solid-run.com>; imx at lists.linux.dev; linux-
> mmc at vger.kernel.org; dl-S32 <S32 at nxp.com>; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH] [v2] mmc: esdhc-imx: convert to modern PM_OPS
>
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
> this email' button
>
>
> On 11/04/25 14:02, Luke Wang wrote:
> > Tested-by: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1 at nxp.com>
>
> Did you test with "# CONFIG_PM is not set"? Because FWIW
> it does not work for me on x86 with CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y
Hi Adrian
Sorry, I didn't test with "# CONFIG_PM is not set". I did the functional test and it work fine.
If # CONFIG_PM is not set, there indeed be problems with compilation.
Regard
Luke
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list