[PATCH v2] arm64: pageattr: Explicitly bail out when changing permissions for vmalloc_huge mappings
David Hildenbrand
david at redhat.com
Fri Apr 4 05:57:01 PDT 2025
On 03.04.25 07:28, Dev Jain wrote:
> arm64 uses apply_to_page_range to change permissions for kernel vmalloc mappings,
> which does not support changing permissions for block mappings. This function
> will change permissions until it encounters a block mapping, and will bail
> out with a warning. Since there are no reports of this triggering, it
> implies that there are currently no cases of code doing a vmalloc_huge()
> followed by partial permission change. But this is a footgun waiting to
> go off, so let's detect it early and avoid the possibility of permissions
> in an intermediate state. So, explicitly disallow changing permissions
> for VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP mappings.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt at kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain at arm.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - Improve changelog, keep mention of page mappings in comment
>
> arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> index 39fd1f7ff02a..04d4a8f676db 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
> * we are operating on does not result in such splitting.
> *
> * Let's restrict ourselves to mappings created by vmalloc (or vmap).
> - * Those are guaranteed to consist entirely of page mappings, and
> - * splitting is never needed.
> + * Disallow VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP mappings to guarantee that only page
> + * mappings are updated and splitting is never needed.
> *
> * So check whether the [addr, addr + size) interval is entirely
> * covered by precisely one VM area that has the VM_ALLOC flag set.
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
> area = find_vm_area((void *)addr);
> if (!area ||
> end > (unsigned long)kasan_reset_tag(area->addr) + area->size ||
> - !(area->flags & VM_ALLOC))
> + ((area->flags & (VM_ALLOC | VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP)) != VM_ALLOC))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!numpages)
Makes sense to me. Whenever required, we can improve the checks (or even
try supporting splitting).
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list