[PATCH] Documentation/process: maintainer-soc: clarify submitting patches
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Wed Sep 25 02:54:43 PDT 2024
On 24/09/2024 15:19, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:08:31PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> Most of these submaintainers have their own trees where they stage patches,
>> sending pull requests to the main SoC tree. These trees are usually, but not
>> -always, listed in MAINTAINERS. The main SoC maintainers can be reached via the
>> -alias soc at kernel.org if there is no platform-specific maintainer, or if they
>> -are unresponsive.
>> +always, listed in MAINTAINERS.
>
> I probably had some specific case in mind with that original wording. I
> presume it still holds true for some smaller platforms, but I cannot
> remember the specific case that prompted it. I'll have to see if I can
> figure out which platforms they are (if any) and get the tree added.
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
>
>> What the SoC tree is not, however, is a location for architecture-specific code
>> changes. Each architecture has its own maintainers that are responsible for
>> architectural details, CPU errata and the like.
>>
>> +Submitting Patches for Given SoC
>> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> +
>> +All usual platform related patches should be sent via SoC submaintainers
>> +(platform-specific maintainers. This includes also changes to per-platform or
> ^ this is unclosed.
Ack. I have v2 with minor text changes in other places as well. I will
send soon.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list