[PATCH v5 2/2] mtd: rawnand: nuvoton: add new driver for the Nuvoton MA35 SoC
Amit Singh Tomar
amitsinght at marvell.com
Mon Sep 23 11:05:22 PDT 2024
> Hi Amit,
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:19:03AM +0530, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > +static int ma35_nand_do_write(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *addr, u32 len)
>> > +{
>> > + struct ma35_nand_info *nand = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>> > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>> > + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
>> > + int ret = 0, i;
>> > + u32 reg;
>> > +
>> > + if (len != mtd->writesize) {
>> > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>> > + writel(addr[i], nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDDATA);
>> > + return 0;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + ma35_nand_dmac_init(nand);
>> > +
>> > + writel(mtd->oobsize, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDRACTL);
>> > +
>> > + writel(INT_DMA, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDINTEN);
>> > + /* To mark this page as dirty. */
>> > + reg = readl(nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDRA0);
>> > + if (reg & 0xffff0000)
>> > + writel(reg & 0xffff, nand->regs + MA35_NFI_REG_NANDRA0);
>> > +
>> > + dma_addr = dma_map_single(nand->dev, (void *)addr, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>> > + ret = dma_mapping_error(nand->dev, dma_addr);
>> > + if (ret) {
>> > + dev_err(nand->dev, "dma mapping error\n");
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> Shouldn't this return -ENOMEM or simply ret when there's an error? Also,
>> should we consider unmapping the page with dma_unmap_single in that case?
>
> When dma_map_single() returns an error the pages are not mapped, no
> need to unmap then.
>
Thanks for the clarification.
-Amit
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list