[PATCH v2 4/4] MAINTAINERS: add MAINTAINER for S32G2 SIUL2 GPIO driver
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Wed Sep 18 01:13:23 PDT 2024
On 18/09/2024 09:57, Andrei Stefanescu wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 17/09/2024 20:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/09/2024 10:29, Andrei Stefanescu wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrei Stefanescu <andrei.stefanescu at oss.nxp.com>
>>> ---
>>> MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 10430778c998..e23c4369b6e1 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -2689,10 +2689,12 @@ ARM/NXP S32G ARCHITECTURE
>>> R: Chester Lin <chester62515 at gmail.com>
>>> R: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
>>> R: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc at oss.nxp.com>
>>> +R: Andrei Stefanescu <andrei.stefanescu at oss.nxp.com>
>>
>> That's another patch where NXP adds silently themself as platform
>> maintainer without explanation. Although here at least existing
>> maintainers are Cced.
>>
>> This looks like some pattern, so maybe clarifications are needed.
>>
>> You wanted to be maintainer of this driver alone, right? So separate entry.
>
> I would actually want to become a maintainer for the platform. I have
> already added changes to the pinctrl driver and the s32g2.dtsi/s32g3.dtsi files.
> I intend to submit more patches to these files and I would like to review
> changes to them.
That's fine, so please provide some sort of message in the commit,
describing your intention, document the commitment.
>
> However, if you or any of the existing maintainers consider that I should
> only add myself as a maintainer for the SIUL2 GPIO driver, I can fix this in v3.
I assume you proposed this after consulting them? It is unusual to add
yourself to maintainers without first talking to existing folks...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list