[PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4: Mark tps659413 regulators as bootph-all
Kumar, Udit
u-kumar1 at ti.com
Thu Sep 12 22:24:37 PDT 2024
On 9/12/2024 9:32 PM, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:19:01PM GMT, Andrew Halaney wrote:
>> This series marks tps659413's regulators as bootph-all in order for
>> the nodes (and parent nodes) to be accessible during MCU's u-boot SPL.
>>
>> This in turn is desired since the tps659413 needs its MCU ESM
>> state machine setup in order for the watchdog to reset the board.
>>
>> This took me a little while to track down, as enabling the ESM, TPS6594,
>> etc in u-boot would result in the below boot failure:
>>
>> U-Boot SPL 2024.10-rc4-00007-g44b12cbcd1b3-dirty (Sep 06 2024 - 14:25:52 -0500)
>> SYSFW ABI: 3.1 (firmware rev 0x0009 '9.2.4--v09.02.04 (Kool Koala)')
>> Initialized 4 DRAM controllers
>> SPL initial stack usage: 13408 bytes
>> ### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###
>>
>> Which turns out to actually have failed far earlier in spl_early_init(),
>> due to these nodes not being accessible in u-boot. That's hard to tell
>> though since console isn't setup until later (and for that reason I
>> think spl_early_init()'s return value in j784s4_init.c isn't
>> evaluated since a panic() at that point would leave a user with *no*
>> information at all).
>>
>> I've tested this in conjunction with a u-boot series which I'll link in
>> a follow-up response on the k3-j784s4-evm. I'd appreciate someone testing
>> on the k3-am69-sk at a minimum, as it should suffer the same fate if things
>> aren't setup appropriately.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney at redhat.com>
> Link to the u-boot series: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3bf2177d-178f-46bf-abfe-6f00a52c623b@ti.com/#t
>
> Udit, it seems you tested the am69-sk patch from this series in the above
> u-boot link, thanks! If that's correct mind adding your Tested-by on
> the patch here then as well?
Yes, Please use for this series on both platforms
Tested-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1 at ti.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Only mark the regulator nodes as bootph-all since parents are implied
>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240906-j784s4-tps6594-bootph-v1-0-c5b58d43bf04@redhat.com
>>
>> ---
>> Andrew Halaney (2):
>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-evm: Mark tps659413 regulators as bootph-all
>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am69-sk: Mark tps659413 regulators as bootph-all
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am69-sk.dts | 8 ++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-evm.dts | 8 ++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>> ---
>> base-commit: 9aaeb87ce1e966169a57f53a02ba05b30880ffb8
>> change-id: 20240906-j784s4-tps6594-bootph-19d3f00fb98a
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Andrew Halaney <ahalaney at redhat.com>
>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list