[PATCH v4 0/4] KVM: arm64: Fix underallocation of storage for SVE state
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Fri Sep 6 09:10:53 PDT 2024
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 04:35:29PM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> > > Can't pKVM just hide the non symmetrically supported VLs using ZCR_EL2,
> > > just as regular KVM does for the guest?
> > > (I may be making bad assumptions about pKVM's relationship with the host
> > > kernel.)
> > That's one for the pKVM people.
> Yes, but that's not really the issue here, unless I'm missing
> something else. The issue is that pKVM needs to store the host's SVE
> state too, to be able to restore it. So hiding non-symmetrically
> supported VLs for the guests shouldn't be relevant.
If the host kernel is also running at EL1 and it's only the hypervisor
running at EL2 then the hypervisor can control the VLs that the host
kernel is able to access?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240906/ff7c68c3/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list