[PATCH 0/2] KVM: Protect vCPU's PID with a rwlock
Sean Christopherson
seanjc at google.com
Thu Oct 31 12:51:29 PDT 2024
On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 13:01:34 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Protect vcpu->pid with a rwlock instead of RCU, so that running a vCPU
> with a different task doesn't require a full RCU synchronization, which
> can introduce a non-trivial amount of jitter, especially on large systems.
>
> I've had this mini-series sitting around for ~2 years, pretty much as-is.
> I could have sworn past me thought there was a flaw in using a rwlock, and
> so I never posted it, but for the life of me I can't think of any issues.
>
> [...]
Applied to kvm-x86 generic, with a comment explaining the vcpu->mutex is the
true protector of vcpu->pid.
Oliver, I didn't add the requested lockdep notification, I really want to make
that a separate discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009150455.1057573-7-seanjc@google.com
[1/2] KVM: Return '0' directly when there's no task to yield to
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/6cf9ef23d942
[2/2] KVM: Protect vCPU's "last run PID" with rwlock, not RCU
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/3e7f43188ee2
--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list