[PATCH v3 03/12] dt-bindings: pci: Add common schema for devices accessible through PCI BARs

[Andrea della Porta]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 08:28 Tue 29 Oct     , Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 03:07:20PM +0100, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> > Common YAML schema for devices that exports internal peripherals through
> > PCI BARs. The BARs are exposed as simple-buses through which the
> > peripherals can be accessed.
> > 
> > This is not intended to be used as a standalone binding, but should be
> > included by device specific bindings.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta at suse.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml   | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  MAINTAINERS                                   |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..e532621f226b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Common Properties for PCI MFD Endpoints with Peripherals Addressable from BARs
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Andrea della Porta  <andrea.porta at suse.com>
> > +
> > +description:
> > +  Define a generic node representing a PCI endpoint which contains several sub-
> > +  peripherals. The peripherals can be accessed through one or more BARs.
> > +  This common schema is intended to be referenced from device tree bindings, and
> 
> Please wrap code according to coding style (checkpatch is not a coding
> style description but only a tool).
> 
> Above applies to all places here and other bindings.

Are you referring to the title being longer than 80 column here, right?
Because the description seems correctly wrapped... or should I add a
newline for each paragraph?

Many thanks,
Andrea

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>