[PATCH v3 3/6] iio: light: stk3310: Implement vdd and leda supplies

[Aren Moynihan]

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 04:38:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 10:19:57AM -0400, Aren Moynihan wrote:
> > The vdd and leda supplies must be powered on for the chip to function
> > and can be powered off during system suspend.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi at xff.cz>
> 
> Missing SoB. Please, read Submitting Patches documentation for understanding
> what has to be done here.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Aren Moynihan <aren at peacevolution.org>
> 
> ...
> 
> > Notes:
> >     I'm not sure what the proper way to handle attribution for this patch
> >     is. It was origionally based on a patch by Ondrej Jirman[1], but I have
> >     rewritten a large portion if it. I have included a Co-developed-by tag
> >     to indicate this, but haven't sent him this patch, so I'm not sure what
> >     to do about a Signed-off-by.
> 
> Ah, seems you already aware of this issue. So, either drop Co-developed-by
> (and if you wish you may give a credit in a free form inside commit message)
> or make sure you get his SoB tag.

Alright, thanks for clarifying that.

> >  	mutex_init(&data->lock);
> 
> Somewhere (in the previous patch?) you want to switch to devm_mutex_init().

Good catch, it looks like that was being leaked before this refactor.
Yeah that sounds like the right place, I'll include it in v4.

> > +	ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(&client->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(data->supplies),
> > +				      data->supplies);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret, "get regulators failed\n");
> 
> > +		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
> > +				     "regulator enable failed\n");
> 
> > +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&client->dev, stk3310_regulators_disable, data);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
> > +				     "failed to register regulator cleanup\n");
> 
> With
> 
> 	struct devuce *dev = &client->dev;
> 
> at the top of the function makes these and more lines neater.
> 
[snip]
> 
> While changing to RCT order here, it seems you have inconsistent approach
> elsewhere (in your own patches!). Please, be consistent with chosen style.

Sounds easy enough to fix, I'll include these in v4.

Thanks taking the time to review
 - Aren