[PATCH 4/4] arm64: mte: Use stage-2 NoTagAccess memory attribute if supported
Oliver Upton
oliver.upton at linux.dev
Mon Oct 28 08:07:53 PDT 2024
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 08:22:02PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
> Hi Oliver,
>
>
> Thanks for reviewing the changes.
>
> Oliver Upton <oliver.upton at linux.dev> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 03:10:14PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
> >
>
> > NOTE: We could also use KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT for this. I chose to
> > add a new EXIT type because this is arm64 specific exit type.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar at kernel.org>
> > ---
>
> I have used KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT as part of the initial prototype.
Ah, apologies, I clearly didn't read the changelog.
> >> + /* KVM_EXIT_ARM_NOTAG_ACCESS */
> >> + struct {
> >> + __u64 flags;
> >> + __u64 gpa;
> >> + __u64 size;
> >> + } notag_access;
> >
> > Can you please look into reusing the memory fault exit infrastructure?
> >
> > The entire point of that is for KVM to tell the VMM it cannot make
> > forward progress because of ${SOMETHING} unexpected at the specified
> > GPA. You can add a new flag that describes tag access.
> >
>
> The only reason I dropped the change was because the flag will be very much
> arm64 specific.
Eh, making it arm64-specific is very much the right call. There's no
shortage of available bits in that structure, and we should make no
attempt to provide a generic description of what is otherwise a very
architecture-specific thing.
> Based on your feedback, I will switch to KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT in the next
> update.
Excellent, thanks!
--
Thanks,
Oliver
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list