[PATCH] Revert "MAINTAINERS: Remove some entries due to various compliance requirements."

[crupest]

 > multiple random anonymous accounts

Your assumption. No clue. But I don't understand how this is related to 
Greg Kroah-Hartman's patch.


> And FYI for the actual innocent bystanders who aren't troll farm accounts

Your judgement. I think they are not innocent. They would also think so. 
But I don't understand how this is related to Greg Kroah-Hartman's patch.


> the "various compliance requirements" are not just a US thing

**not just a US thing** does not help proving Greg Kroah-Hartman'spatch 
correctness.

> And by "news", I don't mean Russian state-sponsored spam.

I read. However, I think they are not **Russian state-sponsored spam**, 
maybe yes. Just like you

  think the news you read is real things. But I don't understand how 
this is related to Greg Kroah-Hartman's patch.


 > please use whatever mush you call brains

I'm using. I think you should have also used.

> I'm Finnish. Did you think I'd be *supporting* Russian aggression?

No, you won't. But I don't understand how this is related to 
Greg Kroah-Hartman's patch.

> Apparently it's not just lack of real news, it's lack of history 
knowledge too.

Your judgement. Maybe yes, maybe no. But I don't understand how this is 
related to Greg Kroah-Hartman'spatch.

I think a smart man like you should not make such wrong logic. And I 
don't think you have to be smart to understand this logic.

I think Linux world is a professional technology world. But I don't know 
how Greg Kroah-Hartman'spatch is professional or technology related.So 
we should **revert it** as it does not fix any bug or adds any feature 
or whatever and it removes some people's contribution. It is **clear** 
why this revert should be done.

If you merge Greg Kroah-Hartman'spatch but not merge this patch to 
revert it is because **you are the leader of Linux and you can do 
anything you want**, then I have nothing to say and just do whatever you 
want.

Have a happy life!