[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: fsl,imx-rproc: add new compatible
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Thu Oct 24 00:45:57 PDT 2024
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 12:21:11PM -0400, Laurentiu Mihalcea wrote:
> From: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea at nxp.com>
>
> Add new compatible for imx95's CM7 with SOF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea at nxp.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml | 58 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> index 57d75acb0b5e..ab0d8e017965 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> @@ -28,6 +28,15 @@ properties:
> - fsl,imx8qxp-cm4
> - fsl,imx8ulp-cm33
> - fsl,imx93-cm33
> + - fsl,imx95-cm7-sof
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 2
> +
> + reg-names:
> + items:
> + - const: dram
> + - const: mailbox
That's quite different programming model. Are you sure these are devices
from similar class/type?
Your big if:then: block suggests this could be separate binding.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list