[PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: memory: mediatek: Add smi-sub-common property for reset
Friday Yang (杨阳)
Friday.Yang at mediatek.com
Wed Oct 23 18:28:56 PDT 2024
On Wed, 2024-08-21 at 10:55 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> On 21/08/2024 10:26, friday.yang wrote:
> > On the MediaTek platform, some SMI LARBs are directly linked to SMI
> > common. While some SMI LARBs are linked to SMI sub common, then SMI
> > sub common is linked to SMI common. Add 'mediatek,smi-sub-comm' and
> > 'mediatek,smi-sub-comm-in-portid' properties here. The SMI reset
> > driver could query which port of the SMI sub common the current
> LARB
> > is linked to through the two properties. The hardware block diagram
> > could be described as below.
> >
> > SMI Common(Smart Multimedia Interface Common)
> > |
> > +----------------+-------
> > | |
> > | |
> > | |
> > | |
> > | |
> > larb0 SMI Sub Common
> > | | |
> > larb1 larb2 larb3
> >
> > Signed-off-by: friday.yang <friday.yang at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > .../mediatek,smi-common.yaml | 2 ++
> > .../memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml | 22
> +++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
> controllers/mediatek,smi-common.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-
> common.yaml
> > index 2f36ac23604c..4392d349878c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
> controllers/mediatek,smi-common.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
> controllers/mediatek,smi-common.yaml
> > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ properties:
> > - mediatek,mt8186-smi-common
> > - mediatek,mt8188-smi-common-vdo
> > - mediatek,mt8188-smi-common-vpp
> > + - mediatek,mt8188-smi-sub-common
> > - mediatek,mt8192-smi-common
> > - mediatek,mt8195-smi-common-vdo
> > - mediatek,mt8195-smi-common-vpp
> > @@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ allOf:
> > compatible:
> > contains:
> > enum:
> > + - mediatek,mt8188-smi-sub-common
> > - mediatek,mt8195-smi-sub-common
> > then:
> > required:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
> controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-
> larb.yaml
> > index 2381660b324c..5f162bb360db 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
> controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-
> controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml
> > @@ -69,6 +69,16 @@ properties:
> > description: the hardware id of this larb. It's only required
> when this
> > hardware id is not consecutive from its M4U point of view.
> >
> > + mediatek,smi-sub-comm:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > + description: a phandle of smi_sub_common that the larb is
> linked to.
>
> Why do you have to smi phandle properties per each node?
>
As shown in the picture from the commit message, we have multipule smi-
sub-common, each SMI larb may link to one of the smi-sub-common. So we
need the 'mediatek,smi-sub-comm' to describe which smi-sub-common the
larb is linked to.
In next version, I will add two smi-sub-common to the diagram in the
commit message.
> > +
> > + mediatek,smi-sub-comm-in-portid:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > + minimum: 0
> > + maximum: 7
> > + description: which port of smi_sub_common that the larb is
> linked to.
>
> Merge it into phandle.
>
Just confirm,
Do you mean merge these two into one property, like:
mediatek,smi-sub-comm = <&phandle port-id>;
> > +
> > required:
> > - compatible
> > - reg
> > @@ -125,6 +135,18 @@ allOf:
> > required:
> > - mediatek,larb-id
> >
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + enum:
> > + - mediatek,mt8188-smi-larb
> > +
> > + then:
> > + required:
> > + - mediatek,smi-sub-comm
> > + - mediatek,smi-sub-comm-in-portid
> > +
>
> and add it to the example (since you claim it is valid for every
> device).
>
OK, I will add this to the example.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list