[PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: Don't map 'kvm_vgic_global_state' at EL2 with pKVM

Will Deacon will at kernel.org
Wed Oct 23 09:39:08 PDT 2024


On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 06:01:17PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:40:16 +0100,
> Will Deacon <will at kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Now that 'kvm_vgic_global_state' is no longer needed for ICC_CTLR_EL1
> > emulation on machines with a broken SEIS implementation, drop the
> > pKVM hypervisor mapping of the page.
> > 
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> > Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton at linux.dev>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c | 17 -----------------
> >  1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c
> > index 174007f3fadd..8fec099c2775 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c
> > @@ -95,7 +95,6 @@ static int recreate_hyp_mappings(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long size,
> >  {
> >  	void *start, *end, *virt = hyp_phys_to_virt(phys);
> >  	unsigned long pgt_size = hyp_s1_pgtable_pages() << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > -	enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> >  	int ret, i;
> >  
> >  	/* Recreate the hyp page-table using the early page allocator */
> > @@ -148,22 +147,6 @@ static int recreate_hyp_mappings(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long size,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	pkvm_create_host_sve_mappings();
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Map the host sections RO in the hypervisor, but transfer the
> > -	 * ownership from the host to the hypervisor itself to make sure they
> > -	 * can't be donated or shared with another entity.
> > -	 *
> > -	 * The ownership transition requires matching changes in the host
> > -	 * stage-2. This will be done later (see finalize_host_mappings()) once
> > -	 * the hyp_vmemmap is addressable.
> > -	 */
> > -	prot = pkvm_mkstate(PAGE_HYP_RO, PKVM_PAGE_SHARED_OWNED);
> > -	ret = pkvm_create_mappings(&kvm_vgic_global_state,
> > -				   &kvm_vgic_global_state + 1, prot);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> > -
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> 
> Maybe add a note indicating that nVHE/hVHE still have that particular
> mapping via the rodata section?

I can add something to the commit message, is that what you had in mind?

> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>

Thanks!

Will



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list