[PATCH v5 21/43] arm64: RME: Runtime faulting of memory

[Aneesh Kumar K.V]

Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com> writes:

.....

> +int realm_map_protected(struct realm *realm,
> +			unsigned long base_ipa,
> +			struct page *dst_page,
> +			unsigned long map_size,
> +			struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *memcache)
> +{
> +	phys_addr_t dst_phys = page_to_phys(dst_page);
> +	phys_addr_t rd = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
> +	unsigned long phys = dst_phys;
> +	unsigned long ipa = base_ipa;
> +	unsigned long size;
> +	int map_level;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(ipa, map_size)))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	switch (map_size) {
> +	case PAGE_SIZE:
> +		map_level = 3;
> +		break;
> +	case RME_L2_BLOCK_SIZE:
> +		map_level = 2;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (map_level < RME_RTT_MAX_LEVEL) {
> +		/*
> +		 * A temporary RTT is needed during the map, precreate it,
> +		 * however if there is an error (e.g. missing parent tables)
> +		 * this will be handled below.
> +		 */
> +		realm_create_rtt_levels(realm, ipa, map_level,
> +					RME_RTT_MAX_LEVEL, memcache);
> +	}
> +
> +	for (size = 0; size < map_size; size += PAGE_SIZE) {
> +		if (rmi_granule_delegate(phys)) {
> +			struct rtt_entry rtt;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * It's possible we raced with another VCPU on the same
> +			 * fault. If the entry exists and matches then exit
> +			 * early and assume the other VCPU will handle the
> +			 * mapping.
> +			 */
> +			if (rmi_rtt_read_entry(rd, ipa, RME_RTT_MAX_LEVEL, &rtt))
> +				goto err;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * FIXME: For a block mapping this could race at level
> +			 * 2 or 3... currently we don't support block mappings
> +			 */
> +			if (WARN_ON((rtt.walk_level != RME_RTT_MAX_LEVEL ||
> +				     rtt.state != RMI_ASSIGNED ||
> +				     rtt_get_phys(realm, &rtt) != phys))) {
> +				goto err;
> +			}
> +
> +			return 0;
> +		}
>

Technically we are are not mapping more than PAGE_SIZE here, but then
the code does the loop above and with that loop should that return 0 be
a 'continue'? if we find the granule delegated, then does that ensure
rest of the map_size is also delegated?


-aneesh