[PATCH net-next 13/15] dt-bindings: net: add compatible strings for lan969x SKU's
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Mon Oct 21 23:11:19 PDT 2024
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 03:58:50PM +0200, Daniel Machon wrote:
> Add compatible strings for the twelve different lan969x SKU's (Stock
> Keeping Unit) that we need to support. We need to support all of them,
> as we are going to use them in the driver, for deriving the devicetree
> target in a subsequent patch.
>
> Also, add myself as a maintainer.
>
> Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund at microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon at microchip.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/net/microchip,sparx5-switch.yaml | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/microchip,sparx5-switch.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/microchip,sparx5-switch.yaml
> index fcafef8d5a33..c38f0bd9a481 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/microchip,sparx5-switch.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/microchip,sparx5-switch.yaml
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ title: Microchip Sparx5 Ethernet switch controller
> maintainers:
> - Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund at microchip.com>
> - Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen at microchip.com>
> + - Daniel Machon <daniel.machon at microchip.com>
>
> description: |
> The SparX-5 Enterprise Ethernet switch family provides a rich set of
> @@ -34,7 +35,21 @@ properties:
> pattern: "^switch@[0-9a-f]+$"
>
> compatible:
> - const: microchip,sparx5-switch
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + - microchip,sparx5-switch
Keep alphabetical order.
> + - microchip,lan9691-switch
> + - microchip,lan9692-switch
> + - microchip,lan9693-switch
> + - microchip,lan9694-switch
> + - microchip,lan9695-switch
> + - microchip,lan9696-switch
> + - microchip,lan9697-switch
> + - microchip,lan9698-switch
> + - microchip,lan9699-switch
> + - microchip,lan969a-switch
> + - microchip,lan969b-switch
> + - microchip,lan969c-switch
All of them use the same match data, so they are compatible? I have
doubts this is necessary in the first place. Your commit description about
driver does not help me. You need them because you are going to use
them? Yeah, it would be surprising otherwise. :)
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list