[PATCH v5 31/43] arm64: rme: Prevent Device mappings for Realms

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 04/10/2024 16:27, Steven Price wrote:
> Physical device assignment is not yet supported by the RMM, so it
> doesn't make much sense to allow device mappings within the realm.
> Prevent them when the guest is a realm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 4f0403059c91..602c49eae90d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1142,6 +1142,10 @@ int kvm_phys_addr_ioremap(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t guest_ipa,
>   	if (is_protected_kvm_enabled())
>   		return -EPERM;
>   
> +	/* We don't support mapping special pages into a Realm */
> +	if (kvm_is_realm(kvm))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +

I believe this is not sufficient. This is only called for GICv2 today.
But we also need to check in  user_mem_abort() and only allow the
mapping if it targeting an unprotected IPA.

Something like:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 26d550ad8393..e433bf8376f2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1710,6 +1710,9 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
         if (exec_fault && device)
                 return -ENOEXEC;

+       if (device && kvm_gpa_from_fault(fault_ipa) != fault_ipa)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
         /*
          * Potentially reduce shadow S2 permissions to match the 
guest's own
          * S2. For exec faults, we'd only reach this point if the guest



Suzuki


>   	size += offset_in_page(guest_ipa);
>   	guest_ipa &= PAGE_MASK;
>