(subset) [PATCH v2 0/4] rockchip: Fix several DT validation errors

[Heiko Stübner]

Hey,

Am Freitag, 18. Oktober 2024, 11:35:51 CEST schrieb Diederik de Haas:
> Hi Heiko,
> 
> On Wed Oct 16, 2024 at 2:35 PM CEST, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > On Wed Oct 16, 2024 at 11:41 AM CEST, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > > On Tue Oct 8, 2024 at 9:28 PM CEST, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:15:35 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > > > > This is a set of 4 small device-tree validation fixes.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Patch 1 adds the power-domains property to the csi dphy node on rk356x.
> > > > > Patch 2 removes the 2nd interrupt from the hdmi node on rk3328.
> > > > > Patch 3 replaces 'wake' with 'wakeup' on PineNote BT node.
> > > > > Patch 4 replaces 'reset-gpios' with 'shutdown-gpios' on brcm BT nodes.
> > > >
> > > > Applied, thanks!
> > > >
> > > > [2/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Remove hdmi's 2nd interrupt on rk3328
> > > >       commit: de50a7e3681771c6b990238af82bf1dea9b11b21
> > > > [3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix wakeup prop names on PineNote BT node
> > > >       commit: 87299d6ee95a37d2d576dd8077ea6860f77ad8e2
> > > > [4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix reset-gpios property on brcm BT nodes
> > > >       commit: 2b6a3f857550e52b1cd4872ebb13cb3e3cf12f5f
> > >
> > > Please revert the 4th patch.
> > >
> > > I must have messed up my testing previously, but BT does not work on the
> > > PineNote with the 4th patch applied and does work with it reverted.
> >
> > FWIW, I figured out what went wrong.
> > My testing was correct, but redo-ing the implementation to make it ready
> > for submission wasn't very smart.
> >
> > With ``shutdown-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PC4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;``
> > it does work correctly, but I forgot to change GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW to
> > GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH before submitting.
> >
> > I'll first figure out a better procedure before making a new submission,
> > so the revert is still the best approach IMO.
> 
> I've now done a new submission:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20241018092237.6774-1-didi.debian@cknow.org/
> 
> So please don't revert the 4th patch now.

hehe ok :-) .
I meant to ask if the fix wasn't simply toggling the gpio polarity, and
I guess with your patch you were faster than my question.

Heiko