[PATCH 2/2] staging: vchiq_arm: Use devm_kzalloc for mgmt

[Stefan Wahren]

Am 13.10.24 um 12:36 schrieb Umang Jain:
>
>
> On 13/10/24 2:43 pm, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> Hi Umang,
>>
>> Am 13.10.24 um 10:45 schrieb Umang Jain:
>>> Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain at ideasonboard.com>
>> except of the missing commit message, this patch looks good to me. I
>> understand the concerns about devm_kzalloc, but I think this doesn't
>> apply in this case.
>
> That's what I was wondering as well, since I tried module unloading
> and with the cdev also goes away? So shouldn't be conern, right ?
AFAIU the problem would be if you bind the resources to the cdev, but
this isn't the case here. Btw I missed to mention that this is
considered as a fix and deserves a Fixes tag.
>
>>
>> Since this should be treated as RFC, is it already tested?
>
> yes, it was tested
>>
>> Regards
>>> ---
>>> drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 4 +---
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
>>> b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
>>> index e780ed714a14..334fb7037766 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
>>> @@ -1345,7 +1345,7 @@ static int vchiq_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>>           return -ENOENT;
>>>       }
>>>
>>> -    mgmt = kzalloc(sizeof(*mgmt), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +    mgmt = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mgmt), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>       if (!mgmt)
>>>           return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> @@ -1403,8 +1403,6 @@ static void vchiq_remove(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>
>>>       arm_state = vchiq_platform_get_arm_state(&mgmt->state);
>>>       kthread_stop(arm_state->ka_thread);
>>> -
>>> -    kfree(mgmt);
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   static struct platform_driver vchiq_driver = {
>>
>