[boot-wrapper v3 1/4] Introduce --with-bw-arch for boot-wrapper compile arch

[Mark Rutland]

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 03:11:00PM +0100, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> Introduce a new autoconf parameter --with-bw-arch that takes
> 'aarch64-a' and 'aarch32-a' as compile architecture, the former
> is selected by default when the parameter is not passed.
> 
> This new parameter superseed --enable-aarch32-bw, its functionality
> is now implemented by --with-bw-arch=aarch32-a.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Fancellu <luca.fancellu at arm.com>
> ---
> Changes from v2:
>  - Major rework, reason in the cover letter.
> ---
>  configure.ac | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index ce41daebc378..bba42fa1dba8 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -9,9 +9,18 @@ AC_INIT([boot-wrapper], [v0.2])
>  
>  AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign])
>  
> -AC_ARG_ENABLE([aarch32-bw],
> -	      AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-aarch32-bw], [build a 32-bit boot-wrapper]),
> -	      [BOOTWRAPPER_ES=32], [BOOTWRAPPER_ES=64])
> +# Allow a user to pass --with-bw-arch={aarch64-a,aarch32-a}
> +AC_ARG_WITH([bw-arch],
> +	AS_HELP_STRING([--with-bw-arch], [aarch64-a selects AArch64-A (default), aarch32-a selects AArch32-A]),

Could we we please make the help text:

	specify boot-wrapper architecture: aarch64-a (default) or aarch32-a

That way ist says what the option does, and it avoids the repeition.

With that change I think this looks good to go.

Mark.

> +	[case "${withval}" in
> +		no|yes|aarch64-a) USE_ARCH=aarch64-a ;;
> +		aarch32-a) USE_ARCH=aarch32-a ;;
> +		*) AC_MSG_ERROR([Bad value "${withval}" for --with-bw-arch. Use "aarch64-a" or "aarch32-a"]) ;;
> +	esac])
> +
> +AS_IF([test "x$USE_ARCH" = "xaarch32-a"],
> +	[BOOTWRAPPER_ES=32], [BOOTWRAPPER_ES=64]
> +)
>  AM_CONDITIONAL([BOOTWRAPPER_32], [test "x$BOOTWRAPPER_ES" = "x32"])
>  
>  AC_ARG_ENABLE([aarch32-kernel],
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>