[PATCH V3 2/7] dt-bindings: clock: Add Qualcomm IPQ5424 GCC binding

[Sricharan Ramabadhran]

On 10/6/2024 2:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/10/2024 12:23, Sricharan R wrote:
> 
>>   maintainers:
>>     - Bjorn Andersson <andersson at kernel.org>
>>   
>>   description: |
>>     Qualcomm global clock control module provides the clocks, resets and power
>> -  domains on IPQ5332.
>> +  domains on IPQ5332 and IPQ5424.
>>   
>> -  See also:: include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq5332.h
>> -
>> -allOf:
>> -  - $ref: qcom,gcc.yaml#
>> +  See also::
> 
> s/::/:/
> 
>> +    include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq5332.h
>> +    include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq5424.h
>>   
>>   properties:
>>     compatible:
>> -    const: qcom,ipq5332-gcc
>> +    enum:
>> +      - qcom,ipq5332-gcc
>> +      - qcom,ipq5424-gcc
>>   
>>     clocks:
>> +    minItems: 5
>>       items:
>>         - description: Board XO clock source
>>         - description: Sleep clock source
>>         - description: PCIE 2lane PHY pipe clock source
>>         - description: PCIE 2lane x1 PHY pipe clock source (For second lane)
>> +      - description: PCIE 2-lane PHY2 pipe clock source
>> +      - description: PCIE 2-lane PHY3 pipe clock source
>>         - description: USB PCIE wrapper pipe clock source
> 
> Why do you change fifth clock on ipq5332?
> 
> Please test your patches - change DTS for ipq5332 and provide PCIE
> 2-lane PHY2 there.

Ho ok, these 2 additional clocks are required only for IPQ5424.
I ran the check_dtbs/dt_binding_check for both IPQ5332/IPQ5424.
Agree that fifth clock should not be changed in default.
So, would it be fine to add these 2 clocks in the end and re-send ?

Regards,
  Sricharan