[PATCH v2 0/3] add clocks support for exynosauto v920 SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 07/10/2024 09:30, sunyeal.hong wrote:
> Hello Krzyszto,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
>> Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 4:20 PM
>> To: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong at samsung.com>; Sylwester Nawrocki
>> <s.nawrocki at samsung.com>; Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi at samsung.com>; Alim
>> Akhtar <alim.akhtar at samsung.com>; Michael Turquette
>> <mturquette at baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>; Rob Herring
>> <robh at kernel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt at kernel.org>
>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org;
>> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-
>> kernel at vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add clocks support for exynosauto v920 SoC
>>
>> On 07/10/2024 09:18, Sunyeal Hong wrote:
>>> This patchset adds the CMU block below to support exynosauto v920 SoC.
>>> - CMU_PERIC1
>>> - CMU_MISC
>>> - CMU_HSI0/1
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>>  - Rebase the patch to reflect the latest fixes
>>
>> Not much improved. Still blind rebase without addressing the issue I
>> pointed out.
>>
>> Allow people to actually review your patches, instead of sending multiple
>> versions within 5 minutes.
>>
>> One patchset per 24h.
>>
> I apologize for sending you the patch version incorrectly multiple times.
> Could you elaborate a bit more on the "unrelated change" part you mentioned in the comment?
> I don't think I understand your exact intention.

I do not see above "unrelated change" quote. Please respond inline.

Best regards,
Krzysztof