[PATCH net-next 10/15] net: sparx5: ops out chip port to device index/bit functions

[Jacob Keller]

On 10/1/2024 6:50 AM, Daniel Machon wrote:
> The chip port device index and mode bit can be obtained using the port
> number.  However the mapping of port number to chip device index and
> mode bit differs on Sparx5 and lan969x. Therefore ops out the function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon at microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund at microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c | 2 ++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.h | 2 ++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_port.c | 4 +++-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_port.h | 7 ++++++-
>  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
> index 8b1033c49cfe..8617fc3983cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.c
> @@ -982,6 +982,8 @@ static const struct sparx5_ops sparx5_ops = {
>  	.is_port_5g              = &sparx5_port_is_5g,
>  	.is_port_10g             = &sparx5_port_is_10g,
>  	.is_port_25g             = &sparx5_port_is_25g,
> +	.get_port_dev_index      = &sparx5_port_dev_mapping,
> +	.get_port_dev_bit        = &sparx5_port_dev_mapping,

So for sparx5, these are identical operations, but for lan969x these
will be different? Ok.