[PATCH v2 1/2] arm64/acpi: panic when failed to init acpi table with acpi=force option

[Levi Yun]

Hi Ard.

>
> Calling panic() at this point does not achieve anything useful,
> though. Without ACPI tables or a DT, the only way to observe this
> panic message is by using earlycon= with an explicit MMIO address, and
> it might be better to limp on instead. Is there anything bad that
> might happen because of this, other than the user's wishes getting
> violated?

IMHO, the most weird thing is progressing boot with acpi table although
it failed to initailise. in this situation continuing to boot maybe
dead in unexepceted places. I think it would be better to prevent
futher progress by calling the panic() in this situation.