[PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: Add Blaize vendor prefix

Nikolaos Pasaloukos nikolaos.pasaloukos at blaize.com
Tue Nov 19 07:23:26 PST 2024


On 19/11/2024 13:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/11/2024 14:33, Nikolaos Pasaloukos wrote:
>> On 19/11/2024 13:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 15/11/2024 15:58, Niko Pasaloukos wrote:
>>>> Blaize, Inc. (www.blaize.com) is a SoC manufacturer with integrated
>>>> programmable Graph-Streaming-Processors for AI and ML.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh at kernel.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nikolaos Pasaloukos <nikolaos.pasaloukos at blaize.com>
>>> Here and in all other patches - you still have the same checkpatch
>>> warning I asked to fix.
>>>
>>>
>>> git format-patch -6 -v5
>>> scripts/checkpatch.pl v5*
>>>
>>> Your SoB does not match From. This MUST be fixed.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> Just to be certain and fix it properly, do you mean that the issue that you
>> are talking about is that the 'From' appears as 'Niko Pasaloukos' and I am
>> signing with SoB as 'Nikolaos Pasaloukos'?
> Yes
>
>> I'm really sorry, if that's the case, I will fix it and yes, there must be
>> a misconfiguration on my system. Would I need to prepare a v6 for this?
>> If it is not that, then I am really sorry but I will need more information.
> Just run checkpatch. I am repeating this over and over. If you run it
> like above and there is no error, then provide some details.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Hi Krzysztof,

That's a very tricky error to pick it up. `checkpatch` on my end doesn't produce
an error. The header file on my patches starts as:
'From: Nikolaos Pasaloukos <nikolaos.pasaloukos at blaize.com>'
I had set the mail account as Forname: Nikolaos, Surname: Pasaloukos and
preferred name as Niko. It is an Outlook365 issue I think.

That said, when I was trying to send my patches, the mail server was converting
my name 'Nikolaos Pasaloukos' to the preferred name 'Niko Pasaloukos'.

Do I need to resend v5 again after this is fixed, having applied all the
additional Reviewed-by? What would be my next step here?

Best regards,
Nikolaos Pasaloukos




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list