[RFC PATCH] clk: core: refine disable unused clocks
Jerome Brunet
jbrunet at baylibre.com
Fri Nov 8 01:59:12 PST 2024
On Fri 08 Nov 2024 at 17:23, Chuan Liu <chuan.liu at amlogic.com> wrote:
>>>> - if (core->flags & CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED)
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * If the parent is disabled but the gate is open, we should sanitize
>>>> + * the situation. This will avoid an unexpected enable of the clock as
>>>> + * soon as the parent is enabled, without control of CCF.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Doing so is not possible with a CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE clock without
>>>> + * forcefully enabling a whole part of the subtree. Just let the
>>>> + * situation resolve it self on the first enable of the clock
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (!parent_enabled && (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE))
>
> At first, I couldn't grasp the logic behind the 'return' here. Now it's
> clear. This approach is equivalent to completely giving up on
> handling clocks with CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE feature in
> clk_disable_unused_subtree().
>
No. It's handled correctly as long as the tree is in coherent state.
What is not done anymore is fixing up an inconsistent tree, by this I
mean: A clock with CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE, which report enabled from its
own registers but has its parent disabled.
In that particular case, clk_disable_unused_subtree() won't be turning on
everything to properly disable that one clock. That is the root cause of
the problem you reported initially. The clock is disabled anyway.
Every other case are properly handled (at least I think).
>>>> goto unlock_out;
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> @@ -1516,8 +1545,7 @@ static void __init clk_disable_unused_subtree(struct clk_core *core)
>>>>
>>>> unlock_out:
>>>> clk_enable_unlock(flags);
>>>> - if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
>>>> - clk_core_disable_unprepare(core->parent);
>>>> + return (core->flags & CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED) && enabled;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static bool clk_ignore_unused __initdata;
>>>> @@ -1550,16 +1578,16 @@ static int __init clk_disable_unused(void)
>>>> clk_prepare_lock();
>>>>
>>>> hlist_for_each_entry(core, &clk_root_list, child_node)
>>>> - clk_disable_unused_subtree(core);
>>>> + clk_disable_unused_subtree(core, true);
>>>>
>>>> hlist_for_each_entry(core, &clk_orphan_list, child_node)
>>>> - clk_disable_unused_subtree(core);
>>>> + clk_disable_unused_subtree(core, true);
>>>>
>>>> hlist_for_each_entry(core, &clk_root_list, child_node)
>>>> - clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(core);
>>>> + clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(core, true);
>>>>
>>>> hlist_for_each_entry(core, &clk_orphan_list, child_node)
>>>> - clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(core);
>>>> + clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(core, true);
>>>>
>>>> clk_prepare_unlock();
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.45.2
>>>>
>> --
>> Jerome
--
Jerome
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list