[PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Clear ITE when DISCARD frees an ITE

[Jing Zhang]

From: Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun at huawei.com>

When DISCARD frees an ITE, it does not invalidate the
corresponding ITE. In the scenario of continuous saves and
restores, there may be a situation where an ITE is not saved
but is restored. This is unreasonable and may cause restore
to fail. This patch clears the corresponding ITE when DISCARD
frees an ITE.

Signed-off-by: Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun at huawei.com>
[Jing: Update with entry write helper]
Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos at google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 7f931e33a425..5d5104af8768 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -782,6 +782,9 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_discard(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 
 	ite = find_ite(its, device_id, event_id);
 	if (ite && its_is_collection_mapped(ite->collection)) {
+		struct its_device *device = find_its_device(its, device_id);
+		int ite_esz = vgic_its_get_abi(its)->ite_esz;
+		gpa_t gpa = device->itt_addr + ite->event_id * ite_esz;
 		/*
 		 * Though the spec talks about removing the pending state, we
 		 * don't bother here since we clear the ITTE anyway and the
@@ -790,7 +793,8 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_discard(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 		vgic_its_invalidate_cache(its);
 
 		its_free_ite(kvm, ite);
-		return 0;
+
+		return vgic_its_write_entry_lock(its, gpa, 0, ite_esz);
 	}
 
 	return E_ITS_DISCARD_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
-- 
2.47.0.277.g8800431eea-goog