[PATCH v4 4/4] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add Airoha EN7581 support

Lorenzo Bianconi lorenzo at kernel.org
Wed Nov 6 14:40:28 PST 2024


> On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:12:44PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Introduce support for Airoha EN7581 PCIe controller to mediatek-gen3
> > PCIe controller driver.
> > ...
> 
> > +static int mtk_pcie_en7581_power_up(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> > +	int err;
> > +	u32 val;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Wait for the time needed to complete the bulk assert in
> > +	 * mtk_pcie_setup for EN7581 SoC.
> > +	 */
> > +	mdelay(PCIE_EN7581_RESET_TIME_MS);

Hi Bjorn,

> 
> It looks wrong to me to do the assert and deassert in different
> places:
> 
>   mtk_pcie_setup
>     reset_control_bulk_assert(pcie->phy_resets)        <--
>     mtk_pcie_en7581_power_up
>       mdelay(PCIE_EN7581_RESET_TIME_MS)
>       reset_control_bulk_deassert(pcie->phy_resets)    <--
>       mdelay(PCIE_EN7581_RESET_TIME_MS)
> 
> That makes the code hard to understand.

The phy reset line was already asserted running reset_control_assert() in
mtk_pcie_setup() and de-asserted running reset_control_deassert() in
mtk_pcie_power_up() before adding EN7581 support. Moreover, EN7581 requires
to run phy_init()/phy_power_on() before de-asserting the phy reset lines.
I guess I can add a comment to make it more clear. Agree?

> 
> > +	err = phy_init(pcie->phy);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize PHY\n");
> > +		return err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	err = phy_power_on(pcie->phy);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "failed to power on PHY\n");
> > +		goto err_phy_on;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	err = reset_control_bulk_deassert(pcie->soc->phy_resets.num_resets, pcie->phy_resets);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "failed to deassert PHYs\n");
> > +		goto err_phy_deassert;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Wait for the time needed to complete the bulk de-assert above.
> > +	 * This time is specific for EN7581 SoC.
> > +	 */
> > +	mdelay(PCIE_EN7581_RESET_TIME_MS);
> > +
> > +	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> > +	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > +
> 
> > +	err = clk_bulk_prepare(pcie->num_clks, pcie->clks);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "failed to prepare clock\n");
> > +		goto err_clk_prepare;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	val = FIELD_PREP(PCIE_VAL_LN0_DOWNSTREAM, 0x47) |
> > +	      FIELD_PREP(PCIE_VAL_LN1_DOWNSTREAM, 0x47) |
> > +	      FIELD_PREP(PCIE_VAL_LN0_UPSTREAM, 0x41) |
> > +	      FIELD_PREP(PCIE_VAL_LN1_UPSTREAM, 0x41);
> > +	writel_relaxed(val, pcie->base + PCIE_EQ_PRESET_01_REG);
> > +
> > +	val = PCIE_K_PHYPARAM_QUERY | PCIE_K_QUERY_TIMEOUT |
> > +	      FIELD_PREP(PCIE_K_PRESET_TO_USE_16G, 0x80) |
> > +	      FIELD_PREP(PCIE_K_PRESET_TO_USE, 0x2) |
> > +	      FIELD_PREP(PCIE_K_FINETUNE_MAX, 0xf);
> > +	writel_relaxed(val, pcie->base + PCIE_PIPE4_PIE8_REG);
> 
> Why is this equalization stuff in the middle between
> clk_bulk_prepare() and clk_bulk_enable()?  Is the split an actual
> requirement, or could we use clk_bulk_prepare_enable() here, like we
> do in mtk_pcie_power_up()?

Nope, we can replace clk_bulk_enable() with clk_bulk_prepare_enable() and
remove clk_bulk_prepare() in mtk_pcie_en7581_power_up() since we actually
implements just enable callback for EN7581 in clk-en7523.c.

> 
> If the split is required, a comment about why would be helpful.
> 
> > +	err = clk_bulk_enable(pcie->num_clks, pcie->clks);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "failed to prepare clock\n");
> > +		goto err_clk_enable;
> > +	}
> 
> Per https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZypgYOn7dcYIoW4i@lore-desk,
> REG_PCI_CONTROL is asserted/deasserted here by en7581_pci_enable().

correct

> 
> Is this where PERST# is asserted?  If so, a comment to that effect
> would be helpful.  Where is PERST# deasserted?  Where are the required
> delays before deassert done?

I can add a comment in en7581_pci_enable() describing the PERST issue for
EN7581. Please note we have a 250ms delay in en7581_pci_enable() after
configuring REG_PCI_CONTROL register.

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/clk/clk-en7523.c#L396

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> Bjorn
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20241106/2d76cbc0/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list