The state of uprobes work and logistics
Peter Zijlstra
peterz at infradead.org
Wed Nov 6 02:46:39 PST 2024
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 06:11:07PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 2:42 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:35:21PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > - Jiri Olsa's uprobe "session" support ([5]). This is less
> > > performance focused, but important functionality by itself. But I'm
> > > calling this out here because the first two patches are pure uprobe
> > > internal changes, and I believe they should go into tip/perf/core to
> > > avoid conflicts with the rest of pending uprobe changes.
> > >
> > > Peter, do you mind applying those two and creating a stable tag for
> > > bpf-next to pull? We'll apply the rest of Jiri's series to
> > > bpf-next/master.
> >
> >
> > Hi Ingo,
> > there's uprobe session support change that already landed in tip tree,
> > but we have bpf related changes that need to go in through bpf-next tree
> >
> > could you please create the stable tag that we could pull to bpf-next/master
> > and apply the rest of the uprobe session changes in there?
>
> Ping. We (BPF) are blocked on this, we can't apply Jiri's uprobe
> session series ([0]), until we merge two of his patches that landed
> into perf/core. Can we please get a stable tag which we can use to
> pull perf/core's patches into bpf-next/master?
The whole tip/perf/core should be stable, but let me try and figure out
how git tags work.. might as well read a man-page today.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list