[PATCH] arm64/mm: Re-organize arch_make_huge_pte()

Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas at arm.com
Fri Nov 1 10:35:37 PDT 2024


On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 10:15:29 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Core HugeTLB defines a fallback definition for arch_make_huge_pte(), which
> calls platform provided pte_mkhuge(). But if any platform already provides
> an override for arch_make_huge_pte(), then it does not need to provide the
> helper pte_mkhuge().
> 
> arm64 override for arch_make_huge_pte() calls pte_mkhuge() internally, thus
> creating an impression, that both of these callbacks are being used in core
> HugeTLB and hence required to be defined. This drops off pte_mkhuge() which
> was never required to begin with as there could not be any section mappings
> at the PTE level. Re-organize arch_make_huge_pte() based on requested page
> size and create the entry for the applicable page table level as needed. It
> also removes a redundancy of clearing PTE_TABLE_BIT bit followed by setting
> both PTE_TABLE_BIT and PTE_VALID bits (via PTE_TYPE_MASK) in the pte, while
> creating CONT_PTE_SIZE size entries.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!

[1/1] arm64/mm: Re-organize arch_make_huge_pte()
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/f8192813dcbe

I think we can now get pte_mkcont() to only set PTE_CONT without
touching PTE_TYPE_PAGE. Previously it wasn't possible because
pte_mkhuge() was clearing the PTE_TABLE_BIT and we added it back via
pte_mkcont(). Give it a try and send an additional patch cleaning up
pte_mkcont() if this works. Thanks.

-- 
Catalin




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list