[PATCH net-next v8 2/2] net: ti: icssg_prueth: add TAPRIO offload support

[Anwar, Md Danish]

Hi Jacob,

On 5/30/2024 11:45 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/29/2024 4:05 AM, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>> From: Roger Quadros <rogerq at ti.com>
>>
>> The ICSSG dual-emac / switch firmware supports Enhanced Scheduled Traffic
>> (EST – defined in P802.1Qbv/D2.2 that later got included in IEEE
>> 802.1Q-2018) configuration. EST allows express queue traffic to be
>> scheduled (placed) on the wire at specific repeatable time intervals. In
>> Linux kernel, EST configuration is done through tc command and the taprio
>> scheduler in the net core implements a software only scheduler
>> (SCH_TAPRIO). If the NIC is capable of EST configuration,user indicate
>> "flag 2" in the command which is then parsed by taprio scheduler in net
>> core and indicate that the command is to be offloaded to h/w. taprio then
>> offloads the command to the driver by calling ndo_setup_tc() ndo ops. This
>> patch implements ndo_setup_tc() to offload EST configuration to ICSSG.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr at ti.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms at kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar at ti.com>
>> ---
> 
> I tried to apply this series to review it. Unfortunately It no longer
> applies cleanly since it has textual conflicts with 972383aecf43 ("net:
> ti: icssg-switch: Add switchdev based driver for ethernet switch
> support"), which was part of:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240528113734.379422-1-danishanwar@ti.com/
> 
> The conflict seemed easy enough to resolve, but I'm not sure if the
> prueth_qos structure would be placed optimally. I tried to build the
> driver to check what the placement should be and was unable to get
> things to compile.

When I had posted this series (v8) the ICSSG switch series was not
merged yet and I had rebased this series on net-next/main. When you
tested it, the ICSSG Series was merged and as it resulted in conflict.

I will rebase it on the latest net-next and make sure that their is no
conflict and post next revision.

Thanks for your feedback.

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Md Danish Anwar