[PATCH v10 08/19] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info()

[Jonathan Cameron]

From: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>

The arm64 specific arch_register_cpu() call may defer CPU registration
until the ACPI interpreter is available and the _STA method can
be evaluated.

If this occurs, then a second attempt is made in
acpi_processor_get_info(). Note that the arm64 specific call has
not yet been added so for now this will be called for the original
hotplug case.

For architectures that do not defer until the ACPI Processor
driver loads (e.g. x86), for initially present CPUs there will
already be a CPU device. If present do not try to register again.

Systems can still be booted with 'acpi=off', or not include an
ACPI description at all as in these cases arch_register_cpu()
will not have deferred registration when first called.

This moves the CPU register logic back to a subsys_initcall(),
while the memory nodes will have been registered earlier.
Note this is where the call was prior to the cleanup series so
there should be no side effects of moving it back again for this
specific case.

[PATCH 00/21] Initial cleanups for vCPU HP.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZVyz%2FVe5pPu8AWoA@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
commit 5b95f94c3b9f ("x86/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES")

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel at armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan at redhat.com>
Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis at oracle.com>
Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu at os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu at arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun at huawei.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron at huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron at huawei.com>

---
v10: Rebased on earlier changes.
     Sign off chain on this one is complex as it James patch
     handled by Russell then substantially modified by me, hopefully
     the tag block reflects that and the various reviews / tests
     etc appropriately.
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 56592462d2fb..f0b7a789f0a1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -359,14 +359,14 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 *  Extra Processor objects may be enumerated on MP systems with
-	 *  less than the max # of CPUs. They should be ignored _iff
-	 *  they are physically not present.
-	 *
-	 *  NOTE: Even if the processor has a cpuid, it may not be present
-	 *  because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now.
+	 *  This code is not called unless we know the CPU is present and
+	 *  enabled. The two paths are:
+	 *  a) Initially present CPUs on architectures that do not defer
+	 *     their arch_register_cpu() calls until this point.
+	 *  b) Hotplugged CPUs (enabled bit in _STA has transitioned from not
+	 *     enabled to enabled)
 	 */
-	if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id))
+	if (!get_cpu_device(pr->id))
 		ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device);
 	else
 		ret = acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device);
-- 
2.39.2