[PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: AArch32: Fix spurious trapping of conditional instructions

[Marc Zyngier]

We recently upgraded the view of ESR_EL2 to 64bit, in keeping with
the requirements of the architecture.

However, the AArch32 emulation code was left unaudited, and the
(already dodgy) code that triages whether a trap is spurious or not
(because the condition code failed) broke in a subtle way:

If ESR_EL2.ISS2 is ever non-zero (unlikely, but hey, this is the ARM
architecture we're talking about), the hack that tests the top bits
of ESR_EL2.EC will break in an interesting way.

Instead, use kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class() to obtain the EC, and list
all the possible ECs that can fail a condition code check.

While we're at it, add SMC32 to the list, as it is explicitly listed
as being allowed to trap despite failing a condition code check (as
described in the HCR_EL2.TSC documentation).

Fixes: 0b12620fddb8 ("KVM: arm64: Treat ESR_EL2 as a 64-bit register")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/aarch32.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/aarch32.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/aarch32.c
index 8d9670e6615d..449fa58cf3b6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/aarch32.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/aarch32.c
@@ -50,9 +50,23 @@ bool kvm_condition_valid32(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	u32 cpsr_cond;
 	int cond;
 
-	/* Top two bits non-zero?  Unconditional. */
-	if (kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu) >> 30)
+	/*
+	 * These are the exception classes that could fire with a
+	 * conditional instruction.
+	 */
+	switch (kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu)) {
+	case ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32:
+	case ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_64:
+	case ESR_ELx_EC_CP14_MR:
+	case ESR_ELx_EC_CP14_LS:
+	case ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD:
+	case ESR_ELx_EC_CP10_ID:
+	case ESR_ELx_EC_CP14_64:
+	case ESR_ELx_EC_SVC32:
+		break;
+	default:
 		return true;
+	}
 
 	/* Is condition field valid? */
 	cond = kvm_vcpu_get_condition(vcpu);
-- 
2.39.2