[PATCH v3 0/4] iommu/smmuv3: Add IOMMUFD dirty tracking support for SMMUv3

[Shameerali Kolothum Thodi]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com>
> Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2024 1:59 PM
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi at huawei.com>
> Cc: iommu at lists.linux.dev; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> robin.murphy at arm.com; will at kernel.org; joro at 8bytes.org;
> ryan.roberts at arm.com; kevin.tian at intel.com; nicolinc at nvidia.com;
> mshavit at google.com; eric.auger at redhat.com; joao.m.martins at oracle.com;
> jiangkunkun <jiangkunkun at huawei.com>; zhukeqian
> <zhukeqian1 at huawei.com>; Linuxarm <linuxarm at huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] iommu/smmuv3: Add IOMMUFD dirty tracking
> support for SMMUv3
> 
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 02:43:04PM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > This is revisiting the earlier attempts [1, 2] to use SMMUv3 HTTU feature
> > for dirty page tracking. The Intel/AMD support is already mainline.
> >
> > Basic sanity tests are done using an emulation setup and on a test
> > hardware setup. Block page split/merge(BBML) is not part of this
> > series. I am planning to send it separately.
> 
> This looks good to me, lets have it go after the merge window. As I
> mentioned please post a version rebased on top of v6.10-rc1. (ie
> based on the patches only in Joerg's current tree) in two weeks.

Ok. I will cherry pick the ones required to make this independent and
post it soon after addressing all the pending comments.

Thanks,
Shameer