[PATCH v1 0/7] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of host fpsimd/sve state in protected mode

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 05:37:36PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:

> Wouldn't it be equally valid to just zero the state that will not be
> preserved regardless of whether or not the guest used fpsimd/sve?

FWIW I've had this benchmarked for some implementations as causing a low
single digits percentage overhead on syscalls (as you'd expect there's
additional overhead when VLs over 128 are supported).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240520/63f31479/attachment.sig>