[PATCH v3] dt-bindings: spi: brcm,bcm2835-spi: convert to dtschema

[Conor Dooley]

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:44 PM Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:30:47PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote:
> >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - Updated DCO email address
> >
> > I was really hoping you'd tell me why you'd not used the same email
> > address, rather than just sending another version. My ulterior motive is
> > that I wrote the section in email-clients.rst saying that protonmail had
> > WKD issues with kernel.org accounts but apparently proton added a
> > workaround and have yet to be sent an email that confirmed that the
> > workaround fixed things. (I'm not sure that the WKD issues ever applied
> > as there's no GPG key posted for conor+dt at kernel.org, only
> > conor at kernel.org).
> 
> Oh, I am primarily using protonmail and I am aware that there are some
> issues with protonmail and kernel.org so for that reason I am sending my
> patches via @gmail.com address. I was trying out some things with
> gmail and proton so had changed my signing email address to @gmail.com
> apart from sending emails I have no motive on using gmail.com account.
> Also I am adding my protonmail account in the `CC`.
> Hope this helps.
> If this is not the intended route then I will change it and stick
> to one email address.

I don't care what email you use for stuff, that's your business. I just
want to know if we can remove the section from the docs that says not to
use proton. Maybe you could send me an off-list email to
conor at kernel.org from your proton account, so I can see if it ends up
getting encrypted? That'd be helpful if you could.

> > The patch is fine IMO though, so
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> 
> Do I need to roll out another version with this reviewed by flag?

No, Mark should be able to pick that up. There's usually no need to
resend patches solely pick up tags, that's the maintainer's
responsibility. If you're resending for any other reason, then yes, pick
up tags.

Cheers,
Conor.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240516/76287803/attachment.sig>